Scottish clubs‘ fan ownership: A model for more EFL sides to follow?

As the possession issues involving Bolton and Bury continue, Sky Sports News examines the fan-owned versions embraced by some Scottish clubs.
Bury were expelled using the EFL after C&N Sporting Risk last week in Sky Bet League One.
With the EFL currently well ready to go over their readmission Gary Neville, who has links with Bury urged Shakers lovers secure the future of their club and to take control.
Bury’s two MPs, fans society Bury and Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham are part.
Meanwhile, Bolton were on the verge of liquidation week until Football Ventures‘ takeover had been confirmed.
The team needed to secure their long term future or risk expulsion.
At 2016, Motherwell turned into a fan-owned Scottish Premiership side together with the Well Society supporters set acquiring a 76 percent shareholding in the bar.
St Mirren were taken over earlier the exact same year, after a joint bid from their former director Gordon Scott and the St Mirren Independent Supporters Association.
They are two examples of sway and enthusiast ownership at football clubs, Stirling Albion were the very first British club to reach 100 per cent fan ownership in 2010 if the Stirling Albion Supporters Trust occurred.
Although the Pars Trust stored from possible and government oblivion in 2013 Dunfermline Athletic East Stirlingshire and clyde have similar arrangements. Annan Athletic voted to become in 2017.
The concept has been embraced by two footballing giants.
Area businesswoman Ann Budge recovered from government in 2014 heart of Midlothian.
Budge is scheduled to hands her shareholding over to the supporters‘ group Foundation of Hearts, that can make Hearts the biggest fan-owned soccer club in the UK.
Budge will remain on for at least a year to guarantee a smooth transition, from which stage supporters will call the shots.
The landscape has changed in Easter Road in recent times, although in 2015, Hibernian declared strategies across Edinburgh to present their fans the opportunity to have at least 51 percent of club stocks.
Majority shareholder Tom Farmer was purchased by US businessman Ron Gordon through the summer, but about a third of shares in Hibernian are now owned by supporters.
A fresh Partick Thistle supporters group have launched their campaign to take charge of the Scottish Championship club , amid concerns over a possible takeover, Last week.
Thistle For Ever say they plan to secure a vast majority shareholding for lovers of the Firhill facet because of speculation around a potential sale to a consortium“with no connections to this club or its own community“.
Supporters groups already own almost 27 percent of the club’s shares, and this effort wants to put in a further 24 per cent, by making an offer to all existing shareholders to sell to their fans.
The move comes after EuroMillions lotto winner Colin Weir withdrew his support for the team and academy following boardroom changes, while speculation is rife that the proprietors of Barnsley are currently still negotiating to get Thistle.
Sky Sports News spoke to members of Motherwell Partick Thistle and St Mirren’s supporters bands, to contrast and compare their thoughts on ownership.
It’s soul and the heart of why you are involved in football you need is the very most appropriate for your club.
I think we’re concerned (about Patrick Thistle’s future). We were told about a deal coming to the table which has been transformational for the club, however no details have emerged.
We’ve gone from a situation in which we had a benefactor donating much to the club (lottery winner Chris Weir, that has since walked away), without a debt, to now a place of uncertainty.
We own nearly 30 percent of this club. If this group of directors are Partick Thistle Buyers, we supply an alternative to those who may choose the club in a different way, that could get it vested over the neighborhood.
We’re debt-free. We must be playing within our means.
I believe fan possession is a model that could work; we’ve seen it right up to clubs that the dimensions of Hearts, it works. You have really got to look at who is in charge, although I think it can be embraced.
Our hearts go out to them at Bolton and Bury. It’s got to come from the fans, they have to galvanise themselves and find the community together; it occurred previously at Exeter City and Wimbledon that were difficult scenarios in England.
Expertise and the knowledge is there today to do it that wasn’t ten to fifteen decades.
What worked (in Motherwell) has been having control. The trick to everything at soccer clubs is controller. In procuring the club, we had good help from Les Hutchison , and the situation was that worked, and we had to cover Les back.
The Motherwell academy has performed astonishingly well, it is a blueprint for Scottish football generally. You only have to check out the goods there which have attracted income into the club.
This time, we have assembled a squad that was reasonably strong that we have not been able to do so before. A lot of the lads done and stepped up to it and have come in.
Within all that, Motherwell is a neighborhood club. I got my newsletter at the other afternoon, telling me just how much I have put into the bar, asking for contributions and ideas… you’re part of it.
I believe that is what fans really want, they do not want to be on the outside being stressed if someone will come in to save their bar, like at Bury or Bolton.
The first hurdle is belief. Paul Goodwin and I had been at a Motherwell match and we were in hospitality, speaking to people there, who had been regular Motherwell fans.
They were individuals who financially could manage to contribute to the Well Society along with the club, but once we talked to them said,“Oh, so that is all a little pie in the sky.“
They did not believe that the lovers could grow in influence and possession and purchase up shares in the bar. You have got a say at the club, although you might not have the whole club Actually if it’s only inching percentage by percentage. I think that is crucial.
Getting people to believe things could change, and getting people to think that is possible, it is a huge obstacle. It astonished me how their feet were shuffling and would not do anything.
We had an owner (former chairman Stewart Gilmour) who’d wished to market up for a long time, and there was no real possibility of anybody coming – no polishing knight in armour!
The fans put their money and found somebody who would take that obligation (current chairman Gordon Scott) then pay back that money.
There was that doubt there, you didn’t know who was going to come together and try to obtain the club. We’ve seen lots of folks come along, buy clubs and desert them again after months or years accountable.
Possessing that ownership gives you that sort of certainty instead of anything else.
Fan possession in itself is comparatively new. Maybe some folks today believe they will have more control because of their investment.
It goes to you and that feeling this is a company, it is a community today, that is the thing that worked.
Those which are not businesses, these smaller clubs, do not really have much more of an alternative. These are neighborhood clubs; Bury was never going to be in Europe.
St Mirren aren’t ever likely to be in Europe, we’ve got those dreams… but they’re all about the fans and that area. Nobody is likely to earn money from these clubs.
It seems common sense why are not they owned by the neighborhood, that since those teams are on the community and by the city?

Read more:

Comments are closed.